In the intricate world of veterinary health care, the role of veterinary nurses/technicians stands as a pivotal element. However, the absence of uniform credentialing standards across the United States has not only bred confusion among consumers but also sparked internal discord within the veterinary profession itself. Recognizing the urgency of addressing this issue, NAVTA has undertaken the task of elucidating its positions on key matters pertaining to credentialing, title protection, and scope of practice.
Credentialing Systems
NAVTA’s stance on credentialing underscores the importance of a standardized framework. It advocates for systems that mandate graduation from accredited veterinary technology or nursing programs, successful completion of the Veterinary Technician National Examination, and a clearly defined scope of practice. Additionally, NAVTA emphasizes the need for title protection, ensuring that terms like “veterinary technician,” “veterinary technologist” (denoted with a “g” at the end of the credential [e.g., CVTg]), and “veterinary technician specialist” (VTS) are reserved for qualified professionals. Furthermore, the inclusion of continuing education requirements is deemed essential to uphold competency and professionalism within the field.
While NAVTA remains steadfast in its ideal criteria for credentialing, it acknowledges the possibility of compromise in certain scenarios. Despite its opposition to the establishment of new alternate routes to credentialing, NAVTA recognizes the historical context wherein many seasoned veterinary nurses/technicians obtained their credentials through such pathways.
Title Definition and Protection
Central to NAVTA’s advocacy efforts is the establishment of title protection and education for various designations within the profession. This includes terms such as “licensed veterinary medical technician” (LVMT), “registered/certified/licensed veterinary technician” (RVT/CVT/LVT), and “registered veterinary nurse” (RVN), among others. By safeguarding these titles and their abbreviations, NAVTA aims to ensure clarity and credibility within the profession, thereby enhancing public trust and recognition of the expertise of veterinary nurses/technicians. Education surrounding additional designations and titles includes the use of “technician” versus “technologist,” the VTS credential, and the “veterinary nurse” title.
- Veterinary technologist and veterinary technician specialist: NAVTA extends its support towards defining and protecting the titles of “veterinary technologist” and “veterinary technician specialist.” In line with this objective, NAVTA advocates for the protection of credential abbreviations associated with these titles (CVTg and VTS, respectively), underscoring the specialized skills and knowledge that these professionals possess.
- Veterinary nurse title: NAVTA underscores the importance of establishing clear distinctions between the titles of “veterinary nurse” and “veterinary technician” while supporting the appropriate usage of each term. This entails reserving the title of “veterinary nurse” exclusively for credentialed veterinary technicians, thereby ensuring accuracy and consistency in professional designations.
Scope of Practice
NAVTA advocates for the delineation of a well-defined scope of practice exclusive to credentialed veterinary technicians and veterinary nurses. In endorsing the American Association of Veterinary State Boards Model Regulations – Scope of Practice for Veterinary Technicians and Veterinary Technologists, NAVTA emphasizes the need for alignment with standardized guidelines to ensure consistency and accountability across different jurisdictions.
Putting This Into Action
To translate these positions into tangible outcomes, NAVTA has established a government relations committee tasked with spearheading advocacy initiatives. This includes engaging in legislative and regulatory processes, collaborating with stakeholders at various levels, and providing support and resources to address pertinent issues. NAVTA encourages stakeholders to actively participate in advocacy efforts and to liaise with their respective state veterinary technician associations. Additionally, individuals are urged to communicate with NAVTA regarding legislative or regulatory developments that could impact the veterinary nurse/technician profession.
In Summary
NAVTA’s positions on credentialing, title protection, and scope of practice reflect its commitment to fostering professionalism, standardization, and advancement within the veterinary nurse/technician profession. By advocating for clear standards, robust protections, and collaborative engagement, NAVTA seeks to uphold the integrity and efficacy of veterinary healthcare delivery while empowering veterinary nurses/technicians in their vital role within the veterinary healthcare team.