Animals with evidence of a widespread systemic inflammatory condition should never be ignored; the deleterious consequences of excessive inflammation may include organ injury and death.<\/p>\n
Recognition and diagnosis of these emergent patients is the focus of Part 1 of this article series; Part 2 will review stabilization and treatment.<\/p>\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.39.54-PM-300x247.png\")
<\/a><\/h2>\n\nLearn More<\/h3>\n
Read the ACCP\/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee’s Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis<\/strong> at journal.publications.chestnet.org\/data\/journals\/chest\/21647\/1644.pdf<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nProfile<\/strong><\/h2>\nDefinition<\/strong><\/h3>\nSystemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)<\/strong> describes a clinical condition characterized by widespread activation of the inflammatory system, secondary to a sterile inflammatory disease or infectious insult (Table 1<\/strong>).<\/p>\nThe term SIRS<\/em> was first introduced by the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine (ACCP\/SCCM) Consensus Conference in 1991, in an attempt to emphasize the importance of the inflammatory process as a systemic contributor to organ failure in patients with sepsis.1<\/sup><\/p>\nInflammatory Response<\/strong><\/h3>\nIn sites of localized tissue damage or infection, it is well known that the localized inflammatory response is characterized by 5 cardinal signs\u2014heat, pain, redness, swelling, and loss of function<\/strong>\u2014which are caused by local capillary dilation and an increase in permeability, and occur in order to protect the host and eliminate noxious agents and injured cells.<\/p>\nHowever, in patients with SIRS, severe local or regional inflammation leads to an “overflow” of inflammatory mediators into the systemic circulation that results in a variety of global derangements that are characterized by vasodilation and increased vascular permeability.<\/p>\n
SIRS versus Sepsis<\/strong><\/h3>\nThe distinction between SIRS and sepsis is based upon the presence or absence of underlying infection (Table 2<\/strong>).<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.38.47-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/h2>\nDiagnosis<\/strong><\/h2>\nClinical Manifestations<\/h3>\n
Clinical manifestations of SIRS and sepsis are often nonspecific and vary depending on the underlying disease process; historical findings also differ and may be nonspecific (Table 3<\/strong>).<\/p>\nIt is important to note that clinical signs of SIRS differ in dogs and cats.<\/strong> Cats frequently do not<\/em> develop a hyperdynamic response (ie, no red mucous membranes nor bounding pulses) and are more likely to have relative bradycardia and hypothermia.2,3<\/sup> In 1 study, bradycardia was identified in 66% of cats, highlighting the difference between dogs and cats with regard to their physiologic responses to sepsis.2<\/sup><\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.37.57-PM-300x229.png\")
<\/a><\/h2>\n![\"Fig](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Fig-1.jpg\")
<\/a>FIGURE 1. Brick red mucous membranes of a dog in the hyperdynamic phase of SIRS.<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.36.44-PM-300x138.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nDiagnostic Criteria<\/h3>\n
Criteria proposed for the diagnosis of SIRS have been extrapolated from the human medical literature for use in dogs and cats.<\/p>\n
Table 4<\/strong> outlines the clinical criteria that provide the best sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing SIRS in septic and nonseptic dogs and cats.2,4<\/sup><\/p>\n\n- In cats, proposed criteria for SIRS were derived from a retrospective study of clinical findings in cats with severe sepsis confirmed at necropsy.2<\/sup><\/li>\n
- In order for a diagnosis of SIRS to be made, dogs must have at least 2 of the 5 criteria present and cats, 3 of the 5 criteria. Sensitivity is increased with the use of stricter inclusion criteria; therefore, the presence of more SIRS criteria in a given patient increases the likelihood of a true systemic inflammatory process.<\/li>\n
- However, depending on the criteria and reference values used, sensitivity and specificity range from 77% to 97% in dogs and 64% to 77% in cats.<\/li>\n
- The clinician should use the SIRS criteria in the context of the clinical picture and the underlying inflammatory disease process to enhance the specificity of the diagnosis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Diagnostic Approach<\/strong><\/h3>\nPatients with SIRS and\/or sepsis should have a complete blood count, serum biochemical profile, urinalysis, and coagulation testing performed. Animals with SIRS frequently have concomitant organ injury or dysfunction that must be detected early in order to determine appropriate therapy, monitor for changes, and assist with prognosis.<\/p>\n
Hematologic and biochemical changes<\/strong> in small animals with sepsis typically reflect the underlying disease process and secondary indices of organ dysfunction, as outlined in Table 5<\/strong>.<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.34.43-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"SIRS](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-2a-300x176.png\")
<\/a>![\"SIRS](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-2b.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nFIGURE 2. Lateral (A) and ventrodorsal (B) abdominal radiographs from a dog with partial mesenteric torsion and ileocolic intussusception. This dog presented with vomiting and clinical signs consistent with septic shock.<\/p>\n
![\"SIRS](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-3-300x244.png\")
<\/a>FIGURE 3. Blood smear from a dog. The central band neutrophil is toxic, with foamy basophilic cytoplasm indicating premature release from the bone marrow due to increased demand. (Wright’s stain; original magnification, x100)<\/p><\/div>\n
![\"FIGURE](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-4-300x244.png\")
<\/a>FIGURE 4. A toxic band neutrophil containing several distinct Dohle bodies, which indicate presence of systemic toxins (often bacterial) that are interfering with development of neutrophils in the bone marrow or accelerated neutrophil production. (Wright’s stain; original magnification, x100)<\/p><\/div>\n
Specifically, hypoalbuminemia<\/em> is likely due to 1 or more of the following:5<\/sup><\/p>\n\n- Loss of albumin from the body via the gastrointestinal tract or wounds, effusion into a third body space, or vascular permeability into interstitial space<\/li>\n
- Hepatic dysfunction<\/li>\n
- Preferential synthesis of acute phase proteins by the liver.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Hyperbilirubinemia<\/em> may be secondary to cholestasis in dogs and, possibly, hemolysis in cats. Ionized hypocalcemia<\/em> is associated with a longer length of hospitalization in both dogs and cats.6,7<\/sup><\/p>\nCoagulation testing<\/strong> may reveal abnormalities associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) due to:8<\/sup><\/p>\n\n- Cytokine-mediated endothelial cell activation<\/li>\n
- Platelet stimulation<\/li>\n
- Increased tissue factor expression<\/li>\n
- Circulating microparticles<\/li>\n
- Fibrin deposition in the microvasculature<\/li>\n
- Decreased endogenous anticoagulants<\/li>\n
- Perturbations in fibrinolysis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Animals with SIRS or sepsis are initially hypercoagulable (this can be difficult to diagnose), but often develop hypocoagulability due to consumption of clotting factors. Changes consistent with later stages of DIC are outlined in Table 5<\/strong>.9<\/sup><\/p>\nIn patients with suspected SIRS\/sepsis, additional diagnostic tests should include mixed venous or arterial blood gas measurements<\/strong> and measurement of serum lactate.<\/strong> Many patients have a metabolic acidosis that reflects poor tissue perfusion and hyperlactatemia.
\nThyroid function tests are frequently deranged in dogs with sepsis or SIRS, but these tests are usually not part of the initial evaluation of these patients.10<\/sup><\/p>\nUrinalysis<\/strong> abnormalities may include isosthenuria due to loss of concentrating ability, proteinuria due to glomerular and\/or tubular damage, glucosuria due to tubular damage and\/or hyperglycemia, bacteria (if a urinary tract infection is present), pyuria, hematuria, and casts secondary to acute kidney injury.<\/p>\nThoracic and abdominal imaging<\/strong> (radiographs and ultrasonography) should be performed in all patients with suspected SIRS or sepsis. Diagnostic imaging should focus on detecting the underlying infectious or sterile inflammatory disease process (eg, pancreatitis), as well as any coexisting secondary organ damage (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome) (Figure 2<\/strong>).<\/p>\nIdentifying Source of Infection<\/strong><\/h3>\nA diagnosis of sepsis can be made once infection is documented and the patient fulfills the species specific criteria for SIRS (Table 4<\/strong>). Patient history and physical examination may initially help guide the search for the source of infection.<\/p>\nAppropriate samples (Table 6<\/strong>) should be collected for culture and susceptibility testing to identify the cause of sepsis and best direct antimicrobial therapy. Aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria are both frequently cultured from septic dogs and cats, depending on the source of the infection.3<\/sup><\/p>\nIn addition to culture and sensitivity testing, fecal testing should be considered in animals with hemorrhagic diarrhea (eg, parvovirus, salmonellosis). Cats should be tested for retroviral diseases, and dogs tested for rickettsial diseases, fungal diseases, and other infectious agents based on regional epidemiology or travel history.<\/p>\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.32.40-PM-300x204.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nCardiopulmonary Function<\/strong><\/h3>\nBaseline cardiopulmonary function should be established since the underlying disease, cytokine-mediated effects, and secondary organ derangements may lead to abnormalities in any or all of the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Arterial blood pressure<\/li>\n
- Electrocardiography<\/li>\n
- Pulse oximetry.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Pathogenesis Of SIRS<\/h2>\n
The pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for generation of SIRS are complex and incompletely understood. The initial insult that stimulates SIRS can come from a variety of sterile sources or infectious agents (Table 1<\/strong>).<\/p>\nSpread of Inflammation<\/strong><\/h3>\nThe inflammatory response may initially start locally (eg, abscess on a limb, trauma) (Figure 5<\/strong>) but, if severe, can progress to cause systemic signs when mediators of inflammation enter the circulatory system and instigate global activation of the inflammatory system.<\/p>\n![\"Fig](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Fig-5-300x225.jpg\")
<\/a>FIGURE 5. A dog with trauma resulting in global activation of the inflammatory system.<\/p><\/div>\n
Although certain cells, such as platelets, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and the endothelium, also play a role, it appears that the stimulation of macrophages (Table 7<\/strong>) and their release of inflammatory cytokines are pivotal in the generation of SIRS.<\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.32.30-PM-300x153.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nProduction of Cytokines<\/strong><\/h3>\nDuring gram-negative sepsis, the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)\u2014the glycolipid component of the cell wall\u2014binds to LPS binding protein (LBP). This LPS\u2014LBP complex binds to membrane-bound CD14 on macrophages, and this binding leads to:<\/p>\n
\n- Activation of macrophages<\/li>\n
- Initiation of intracellular signaling that begins transcription of inflammatory cytokines (Table 8<\/strong>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
In addition to proinflammatory mediators, the response also generates anti-inflammatory cytokines (Table 8<\/strong>), soluble receptors, and receptor antagonists for cytokines. This compensatory response is often referred to as compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS).<\/strong><\/p>\nAlthough CARS beneficially balances out the proinflammatory state often seen with SIRS, excessive CARS stimulation may contribute to immunodeficiency and increased susceptibility to infection in the later stages of sepsis.11,12<\/sup><\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.30.57-PM-300x220.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nImmune Response<\/strong><\/h3>\nWhen the immune system is fighting pathogens or repairing damaged tissue, proinflammatory cytokines signal immune cells, such as T-cells and macrophages, to travel to the site of infection. In addition, cytokines activate these recruited immune cells to produce more cytokines.<\/p>\n
While cytokines trigger a beneficial inflammatory response that promotes local coagulation to confine tissue damage, excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines can be more dangerous than the original stimulus because they:<\/p>\n
\n- Overcome the normal regulation of the immune response<\/li>\n
- Produce the clinical signs classically seen in patients with SIRS.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
This production of a “cytokine storm<\/strong>” and global activation of white blood cells (WBCs) ultimately overwhelms the CARS, becoming the key component in the pathogenesis of SIRS<\/strong>. The diagnostic and prognostic utility of serum cytokine levels in animals with sepsis and SIRS is the subject of recent and continued investigation.5,13-20<\/sup><\/p>\n![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.28.53-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"SIRS](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-6a-300x176.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"SIRS](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/SIRS-fig-6b.png\")
<\/a>FIGURE 6. A dog with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to SIRS; following intubation for unsuccessful cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation, a large volume of bloody fluid poured out of the endotracheal tube (A). Thoracic radiograph of a dog with acute respiratory distress syndrome showing diffuse severe bilateral alveolar infiltrates (B).<\/p><\/div>\n
Development of Organ Dysfunction<\/strong><\/h3>\nIn addition to systemic activation of WBCs, other pathologic effects of inflammatory mediators include:<\/p>\n
\n- Increased capillary permeability<\/li>\n
- Vasodilation<\/li>\n
- Activation of coagulation<\/li>\n
- Myocardial dysfunction<\/li>\n
- Mitochondrial dysfunction.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Mitochondrial dysfunction, which leads to a reduction in cellular adenosine triphosphate, is thought to play an important role in development of organ dysfunction and\/or failure. This mitochondrial failure likely occurs secondary to tissue ischemia, resulting from:<\/p>\n
Learn More<\/h3>\n
Read the ACCP\/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee’s Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis<\/strong> at journal.publications.chestnet.org\/data\/journals\/chest\/21647\/1644.pdf<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)<\/strong> describes a clinical condition characterized by widespread activation of the inflammatory system, secondary to a sterile inflammatory disease or infectious insult (Table 1<\/strong>).<\/p>\n The term SIRS<\/em> was first introduced by the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine (ACCP\/SCCM) Consensus Conference in 1991, in an attempt to emphasize the importance of the inflammatory process as a systemic contributor to organ failure in patients with sepsis.1<\/sup><\/p>\n In sites of localized tissue damage or infection, it is well known that the localized inflammatory response is characterized by 5 cardinal signs\u2014heat, pain, redness, swelling, and loss of function<\/strong>\u2014which are caused by local capillary dilation and an increase in permeability, and occur in order to protect the host and eliminate noxious agents and injured cells.<\/p>\n However, in patients with SIRS, severe local or regional inflammation leads to an “overflow” of inflammatory mediators into the systemic circulation that results in a variety of global derangements that are characterized by vasodilation and increased vascular permeability.<\/p>\n The distinction between SIRS and sepsis is based upon the presence or absence of underlying infection (Table 2<\/strong>).<\/p>\n Clinical manifestations of SIRS and sepsis are often nonspecific and vary depending on the underlying disease process; historical findings also differ and may be nonspecific (Table 3<\/strong>).<\/p>\n It is important to note that clinical signs of SIRS differ in dogs and cats.<\/strong> Cats frequently do not<\/em> develop a hyperdynamic response (ie, no red mucous membranes nor bounding pulses) and are more likely to have relative bradycardia and hypothermia.2,3<\/sup> In 1 study, bradycardia was identified in 66% of cats, highlighting the difference between dogs and cats with regard to their physiologic responses to sepsis.2<\/sup><\/p>\n FIGURE 1. Brick red mucous membranes of a dog in the hyperdynamic phase of SIRS.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Criteria proposed for the diagnosis of SIRS have been extrapolated from the human medical literature for use in dogs and cats.<\/p>\n Table 4<\/strong> outlines the clinical criteria that provide the best sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing SIRS in septic and nonseptic dogs and cats.2,4<\/sup><\/p>\n Patients with SIRS and\/or sepsis should have a complete blood count, serum biochemical profile, urinalysis, and coagulation testing performed. Animals with SIRS frequently have concomitant organ injury or dysfunction that must be detected early in order to determine appropriate therapy, monitor for changes, and assist with prognosis.<\/p>\n Hematologic and biochemical changes<\/strong> in small animals with sepsis typically reflect the underlying disease process and secondary indices of organ dysfunction, as outlined in Table 5<\/strong>.<\/p>\n FIGURE 2. Lateral (A) and ventrodorsal (B) abdominal radiographs from a dog with partial mesenteric torsion and ileocolic intussusception. This dog presented with vomiting and clinical signs consistent with septic shock.<\/p>\n FIGURE 3. Blood smear from a dog. The central band neutrophil is toxic, with foamy basophilic cytoplasm indicating premature release from the bone marrow due to increased demand. (Wright’s stain; original magnification, x100)<\/p><\/div>\n FIGURE 4. A toxic band neutrophil containing several distinct Dohle bodies, which indicate presence of systemic toxins (often bacterial) that are interfering with development of neutrophils in the bone marrow or accelerated neutrophil production. (Wright’s stain; original magnification, x100)<\/p><\/div>\n Specifically, hypoalbuminemia<\/em> is likely due to 1 or more of the following:5<\/sup><\/p>\n Hyperbilirubinemia<\/em> may be secondary to cholestasis in dogs and, possibly, hemolysis in cats. Ionized hypocalcemia<\/em> is associated with a longer length of hospitalization in both dogs and cats.6,7<\/sup><\/p>\n Coagulation testing<\/strong> may reveal abnormalities associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) due to:8<\/sup><\/p>\n Animals with SIRS or sepsis are initially hypercoagulable (this can be difficult to diagnose), but often develop hypocoagulability due to consumption of clotting factors. Changes consistent with later stages of DIC are outlined in Table 5<\/strong>.9<\/sup><\/p>\n In patients with suspected SIRS\/sepsis, additional diagnostic tests should include mixed venous or arterial blood gas measurements<\/strong> and measurement of serum lactate.<\/strong> Many patients have a metabolic acidosis that reflects poor tissue perfusion and hyperlactatemia. Urinalysis<\/strong> abnormalities may include isosthenuria due to loss of concentrating ability, proteinuria due to glomerular and\/or tubular damage, glucosuria due to tubular damage and\/or hyperglycemia, bacteria (if a urinary tract infection is present), pyuria, hematuria, and casts secondary to acute kidney injury.<\/p>\n Thoracic and abdominal imaging<\/strong> (radiographs and ultrasonography) should be performed in all patients with suspected SIRS or sepsis. Diagnostic imaging should focus on detecting the underlying infectious or sterile inflammatory disease process (eg, pancreatitis), as well as any coexisting secondary organ damage (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome) (Figure 2<\/strong>).<\/p>\n A diagnosis of sepsis can be made once infection is documented and the patient fulfills the species specific criteria for SIRS (Table 4<\/strong>). Patient history and physical examination may initially help guide the search for the source of infection.<\/p>\n Appropriate samples (Table 6<\/strong>) should be collected for culture and susceptibility testing to identify the cause of sepsis and best direct antimicrobial therapy. Aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria are both frequently cultured from septic dogs and cats, depending on the source of the infection.3<\/sup><\/p>\n In addition to culture and sensitivity testing, fecal testing should be considered in animals with hemorrhagic diarrhea (eg, parvovirus, salmonellosis). Cats should be tested for retroviral diseases, and dogs tested for rickettsial diseases, fungal diseases, and other infectious agents based on regional epidemiology or travel history.<\/p>\n Baseline cardiopulmonary function should be established since the underlying disease, cytokine-mediated effects, and secondary organ derangements may lead to abnormalities in any or all of the following:<\/p>\n The pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for generation of SIRS are complex and incompletely understood. The initial insult that stimulates SIRS can come from a variety of sterile sources or infectious agents (Table 1<\/strong>).<\/p>\n The inflammatory response may initially start locally (eg, abscess on a limb, trauma) (Figure 5<\/strong>) but, if severe, can progress to cause systemic signs when mediators of inflammation enter the circulatory system and instigate global activation of the inflammatory system.<\/p>\n FIGURE 5. A dog with trauma resulting in global activation of the inflammatory system.<\/p><\/div>\n Although certain cells, such as platelets, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and the endothelium, also play a role, it appears that the stimulation of macrophages (Table 7<\/strong>) and their release of inflammatory cytokines are pivotal in the generation of SIRS.<\/p>\n During gram-negative sepsis, the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)\u2014the glycolipid component of the cell wall\u2014binds to LPS binding protein (LBP). This LPS\u2014LBP complex binds to membrane-bound CD14 on macrophages, and this binding leads to:<\/p>\n In addition to proinflammatory mediators, the response also generates anti-inflammatory cytokines (Table 8<\/strong>), soluble receptors, and receptor antagonists for cytokines. This compensatory response is often referred to as compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS).<\/strong><\/p>\n Although CARS beneficially balances out the proinflammatory state often seen with SIRS, excessive CARS stimulation may contribute to immunodeficiency and increased susceptibility to infection in the later stages of sepsis.11,12<\/sup><\/p>\n When the immune system is fighting pathogens or repairing damaged tissue, proinflammatory cytokines signal immune cells, such as T-cells and macrophages, to travel to the site of infection. In addition, cytokines activate these recruited immune cells to produce more cytokines.<\/p>\n While cytokines trigger a beneficial inflammatory response that promotes local coagulation to confine tissue damage, excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines can be more dangerous than the original stimulus because they:<\/p>\n This production of a “cytokine storm<\/strong>” and global activation of white blood cells (WBCs) ultimately overwhelms the CARS, becoming the key component in the pathogenesis of SIRS<\/strong>. The diagnostic and prognostic utility of serum cytokine levels in animals with sepsis and SIRS is the subject of recent and continued investigation.5,13-20<\/sup><\/p>\n FIGURE 6. A dog with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to SIRS; following intubation for unsuccessful cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation, a large volume of bloody fluid poured out of the endotracheal tube (A). Thoracic radiograph of a dog with acute respiratory distress syndrome showing diffuse severe bilateral alveolar infiltrates (B).<\/p><\/div>\n In addition to systemic activation of WBCs, other pathologic effects of inflammatory mediators include:<\/p>\n Mitochondrial dysfunction, which leads to a reduction in cellular adenosine triphosphate, is thought to play an important role in development of organ dysfunction and\/or failure. This mitochondrial failure likely occurs secondary to tissue ischemia, resulting from:<\/p>\nProfile<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Definition<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Inflammatory Response<\/strong><\/h3>\n
SIRS versus Sepsis<\/strong><\/h3>\n
![\"Screen](\"https:\/\/todaysveterinarypractice.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2015\/01\/Screen-Shot-2015-05-12-at-4.39.54-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/h2>\nDiagnosis<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Clinical Manifestations<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/h2>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\nDiagnostic Criteria<\/h3>\n
\n
Diagnostic Approach<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a>\n
\n
\nThyroid function tests are frequently deranged in dogs with sepsis or SIRS, but these tests are usually not part of the initial evaluation of these patients.10<\/sup><\/p>\nIdentifying Source of Infection<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nCardiopulmonary Function<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
Pathogenesis Of SIRS<\/h2>\n
Spread of Inflammation<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/a><\/p>\nProduction of Cytokines<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/a><\/p>\nImmune Response<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>Development of Organ Dysfunction<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n