Curtis G. Rheingold
DVM, MS
Dr. Rheingold is an emergency and critical care resident at the University of Pennsylvania. He obtained his DVM and MS in laboratory animal medicine degrees from the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, followed by a rotating medicine and surgery internship at Blue Pearl Pet Hospital in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. His areas of interest include the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor therapy.
Read Articles Written by Curtis G. RheingoldLori S. Waddell
DVM, DACVECC
Dr. Waddell graduated from Cornell University’s College of Veterinary Medicine and completed an internship at Angell Memorial Animal Hospital. She worked as an emergency clinician in private practice before completing a residency in emergency and critical care medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Waddell is a diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. She is a professor of clinical critical care medicine and medical director of the intensive care unit at the University of Pennsylvania. Her current areas of interest include fluid therapy, acid–base disturbances, and coagulation in critically ill patients.
Updated August 2024
Read Articles Written by Lori S. WaddellBacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats can be caused by inhalation of pathogens, aspiration of bacteria, or (less likely) hematogenous spread or inhalation of foreign bodies. Before initiating empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics for patients requiring hospitalization or those predisposed to multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, airway sampling is recommended, if possible. After culture and sensitivity results are available and depending on patient response to treatment, antimicrobial therapy should be de-escalated. Adjunctive therapeutics include supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluids, and physiotherapy aimed at promoting clearance of mucus. The treatment, presentation, and approach to pneumonia frequently differ between species, and the disease is less common in cats than in dogs.
Take-Home Points
- Bacterial pneumonia is a common cause of pulmonary parenchymal disease in dogs and, to a lesser extent, cats.
- The gold standard for guiding antimicrobial therapy is airway sampling (e.g., by endotracheal wash) to collect specimens for cytology and culture/sensitivity.
- Pneumonia in dogs and cats can be caused by gram-positive bacteria (e.g., Streptococcus species, Staphylococcus species, Enterococcus species), gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, Pasteurella species), and Mycoplasma species.
- Bordetella bronchiseptica infection, a common cause of infectious bronchopneumonia in puppies, can be treated with oral doxycycline (for patients well enough for outpatient treatment) or intravenous azithromycin (for hospitalized patients requiring IV fluids and oxygen supplementation).
- Human medicine has transitioned to shorter-duration (5–7 days) antibiotic therapy for treatment of pneumonia, and early evidence in veterinary medicine suggests that shorter durations of antibiotics may be safe and effective for some cases of bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats.
- If bacterial pneumonia is treated and managed appropriately, the prognosis in most dogs and cats is good.
Pneumonia is a common cause of pulmonary parenchymal disease in dogs and less so in cats. Pneumonia most commonly falls into the categories of aspiration or infectious bronchopneumonia. Aspiration pneumonia is caused by inhalation of orogastric secretions and/or ingesta containing enteric bacterial organisms. Infectious bronchopneumonia (also called community-acquired pneumonia) is caused by inhalation of pathogens spread by other animals. Less frequent causes of bacterial pneumonia include infections from hematogenous spread or contaminated inhaled foreign bodies.
Many comorbidities are associated with increased risk for certain types of pneumonia (TABLE 1). Dogs frequently exposed to other dogs are at a higher risk for infectious bronchopneumonia. A definitive diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia requires cytology and/or culture.
This article explores common questions regarding the treatment and management of bacterial pneumonia and focuses on aspiration pneumonia and infectious bronchopneumonia. The authors direct readers to other sources regarding the diagnosis of pneumonia as well as treatment of nonbacterial pneumonias (e.g., viral, protozoal, fungal), which are beyond the scope of this article.1-3
How is an antimicrobial plan developed?
Antimicrobial selection is ideally based on culture and sensitivity testing of airway samples, particularly for patients that require hospitalization. Airway sampling with culture is most indicated for patients with suspected infectious pneumonia and patients at risk for infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (e.g., those with hospital-acquired infections, recent antibiotic receipt, or chronic pulmonary disease). Samples can be collected via tracheal wash (endotracheal or transtracheal) or by bronchoalveolar lavage (which requires bronchoscopy). Endotracheal wash requires the least specialized equipment and is most feasible in a general practice setting (FIGURE 1, BOX 1). Deep oral swabs do not usually yield the same sensitivity as tracheal washes.4 In addition, canine- and feline-specific respiratory polymerase chain reaction panels can detect common respiratory viruses and bacteria in nasopharyngeal and nasal swab samples. A retrospective study of airway sampling and culture from dogs with pneumonia found that for 57.4% of dogs that recently received antimicrobials, bacteria with resistance to empirically selected antimicrobials were isolated.5
Figure 1. An endotracheal wash being performed by using a red rubber catheter, Luer lock “Christmas tree” style adapter, and a 20-mL syringe.
- Equipment: Gather a sterile endotracheal (ET) tube, sterile saline, 2–3 sterile 10-mL to 20-mL syringes, sterile gloves, 2 sterile red rubber catheter tubes (longer than the chosen ET tube/largest size that will fit), anesthesia/sedation equipment and drugs. Optional (but preferred): Suction, suction catheter, and mucus trap
- Setup: Don sterile gloves and, using sterile technique, draw up sterile saline into 10-mL syringes, filling the rest of the syringe with air. Recommended volumes: Cats/dogs < 10 kg, 3 mL of saline; dogs ≥ 10 kg, 3–5 mL of saline
- Preoxygenation: Preoxygenate the patient with 100% oxygen via flow-by or mask delivery system. Note: Some patients will require light sedation.
- Induction: Induce a light plane of anesthesia by using desired anesthetic protocol to allow ET intubation.
- Intubation: Perform ET intubation by using sterile technique and taking care to avoid contaminating the tube with the oral cavity. If possible, do not use lubricant as it can confound cytologic interpretation of airway samples. Routinely tie in the tube and inflate the cuff.
- Saline administration: Sterilely insert the red rubber catheter as far as it can advance. Attach and flush entire saline syringe contents into the catheter, following the saline with remaining air to push the fluid out of the catheter. Additional air may be needed.
- Coupage and suction: Have a nonsterile assistant gently coupage the chest to loosen mucus and/or elicit a cough reflex. During coupage, firmly aspirate the syringe to collect fluid from the airway. Perform several times, and detach the syringe between attempts to expel excess air. Use care to avoid loss of sample fluid when removing air. Optional: If the equipment is available, attach a suction catheter to a mucus trap that is connected to portable or central suction to collect the sample.
- Repeat: If an insufficient sample has been collected, repeat the process with another syringe of sterile saline and air.
- Patient recovery: After a sufficient sample has been collected (~50% or less of initial saline volume), attach the patient’s ET tube to oxygen and monitor until the patient can be safely extubated.
- Sample submission: Samples collected from the ET wash can be submitted for cytology, culture and sensitivity, or other infectious disease testing. In-house Gram stain and cytology are recommended to guide the initial antimicrobial decision making.
While culture results are pending or if airway sampling cannot be performed due to patient, practitioner, or client limitations, empiric antimicrobial therapy should be initiated. Antimicrobial selection should be based on signalment, likely route of infection, and patient risk factors. For example, puppies exposed to other dogs are at particular risk for infectious bronchopneumonia caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica. For adult dogs, common bacterial isolates include Escherichia coli, Pasteurella species, Staphylococcus species, Streptococcus species, and enteric bacteria such as Klebsiella species or Enterococcus species.6,7 Mycoplasma species are often present as opportunistic coinfections; their relevance as a primary pathogen is unclear but should be treated if cultured.8 Bacterial pneumonia does not develop in all patients after aspiration; aspiration of gastric acid or food material can lead to sterile pneumonitis. This distinction is difficult to ascertain without airway sampling, and potential infection should be treated if aspiration pneumonia is diagnosed, particularly if the patient is showing clinical signs.
Given that gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria commonly cause pneumonia, broad-spectrum coverage is indicated. De-escalation to a narrower antimicrobial spectrum is based on culture and sensitivity results when available, but further escalation may be needed if the patient worsens while culture results are pending. Doxycycline is a reasonable empiric choice for infectious bronchopneumonia as both B bronchiseptica and Mycoplasma species are generally susceptible.9 β-Lactam antibiotics (e.g., amoxicillin, cephalexin) are not recommended for treatment of B bronchiseptica due to poor penetration into the larger airways where B bronchiseptica tends to colonize. Instead, if the dog is clinically ill (e.g., fever, systemic clinical signs) with suspected infectious bronchopneumonia or aspiration pneumonia, broader-spectrum coverage should be started (TABLE 2).10 Hospitalized patients should initially receive parenteral antibiotics, and treatment should transition to oral administration after the patient clinically improves and is eating. Penetration through the pulmonary epithelium varies by antibiotic class, but inflammation can disrupt the blood–alveolar barrier and allow some drugs that would otherwise be excluded (e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins) to reach therapeutic concentrations in the alveoli.
In human medicine, the recommended treatment of uncomplicated pneumonia is a 5- to 7-day course of antimicrobials. Longer courses are considered for nosocomial infections, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, or for patients that remain clinically unstable.11 Veterinary medicine has historically recommended treatment with antibiotics for several weeks. However, recent evidence has found that shorter courses of antibiotics (7 to 10 days) may be acceptable for dogs with uncomplicated pneumonia, particularly aspiration pneumonia.12,13
What other treatments should be considered?
Patients with moderate to severe pneumonia are often hypoxemic and require supplemental oxygen, which can be provided via nasal prongs or cannulae, an oxygen hood made from an Elizabethan collar (FIGURE 2), or an oxygen cage. Some patients may require additional support, such as high-flow nasal oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
Figure 2. An oxygen hood made of plastic wrap and an Elizabethan collar. The upper 25% of the collar opening has been left open to allow for warmer, exhaled carbon dioxide to escape.
For pneumonia patients sick enough to require hospitalization, fluid therapy is usually indicated, aimed at preventing dehydration and maintaining normal perfusion parameters. The mucociliary escalator, a vital component of the respiratory immune system, relies on proper hydration for normal function. Overzealous fluid administration should be avoided as it can lead to interstitial or pulmonary edema and worsened respiratory signs and hypoxemia.14 Nebulization with 0.9% saline can be used to hydrate respiratory secretions to promote mucus clearance, although this practice is not guided by any published clinical evidence.
Use of several other adjunctive therapies is supported by varying degrees of evidence. For humans, corticosteroid use may offer a mortality benefit for those with severe community-acquired pneumonia.15 For veterinary patients, the theoretical anti-inflammatory effects of steroids must be weighed against patient contraindications and risk for immunosuppression. Early mobilization may be somewhat beneficial for humans with pneumonia, and veterinary patients should be frequently taken for walks or have recumbency changed, if tolerated.16 Because the cough reflex is an essential means of clearing respiratory pathogens, administration of cough suppressants is contraindicated. Also contraindicated are furosemide or other diuretics because they can cause dehydration of the airway surface liquid layer and decrease systemic perfusion.
How does pneumonia differ for cats?
Bacterial pneumonia is less common in cats than in dogs but is probably underdiagnosed because noninvasive diagnostic testing is often not very sensitive for the disease. Cats with histologic evidence of pneumonia may not demonstrate hematologic or radiographic changes typical of canine pneumonia.17 The clinical presentations of inflammatory airway disease and infectious bronchopneumonia in cats (e.g., wheezing) substantially overlap.18 Bronchodilators such as terbutaline, albuterol, or aminophylline may be somewhat beneficial for cats by reducing bronchoconstriction. Airway sampling (e.g., by endotracheal wash) can help differentiate between causes of pulmonary parenchymal disease.
Cats with pneumonia should be tested for feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus because both retroviral diseases can lead to immunocompromise and a predisposition to secondary infections.3 Common bacteria associated with pneumonia in cats include Pasteurella multocida, B bronchiseptica, and Mycoplasma species.19 Cats are prone to both viral and bacterial upper respiratory infections, but secondary pneumonia is not a common sequela.
Antimicrobial dosing and adverse effects differ between dogs and cats. In cats, enrofloxacin should be used only at doses of 5 mg/kg/day due to the risk for retinal degeneration with higher dosages. Enrofloxacin can also increase the serum concentration of the bronchodilators aminophylline and theophylline and lead to systemic signs of toxicity in both species.20 When given without concurrent food or water, clindamycin and doxycycline both carry a risk for esophagitis and subsequent esophageal stricture formation. That risk is greater in cats than dogs, but it is possible in any animal.
What is the prognosis for dogs and cats with pneumonia?
The prognosis for treatment of bacterial and aspiration pneumonia is generally good. Reported survival rates for dogs range from 77% to 88% with appropriate treatment, and rates for cats (according to 1 study) are 89%.6,21-23 Dogs that experience multiple episodes of pneumonia or have previously received antimicrobials may be at higher risk for infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Infectious bronchopneumonia caused by B bronchiseptica often responds well to appropriate antibiotic therapy. Regardless of the cause of pneumonia, complications (e.g., pulmonary abscesses, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome) carry a guarded prognosis and should be considered for patients that do not respond to treatment. Vaccination for communicable diseases and a focus on early diagnosis and appropriate treatment optimizes outcomes. B bronchiseptica vaccination should be considered for all dogs at risk for exposure.
Summary
The cornerstone of bacterial pneumonia treatment is a targeted antimicrobial plan, ideally guided by cytology and/or airway sample culture and sensitivity testing and adequate supportive care. The rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria in humans and animals emphasizes the need to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use and excessive treatment durations.24 If possible, an initial broad-spectrum approach followed by culture-guided de-escalation is recommended. This along with supportive care, including supplemental oxygen (if needed), fluids, and other adjunctive therapies, provides the best chance for a full recovery. Treatment or correction of underlying disease processes that led to the development of pneumonia should reduce the likelihood of future episodes of pneumonia.
References
1. Dear JD. Bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats: an update. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020;50(2):447-465. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.10.007
2. Boag AK, Schoeffler GL. Pneumonia. In: Silverstein DC, Hopper K, eds. Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2023:137-148.
3. Cohn LA. Pulmonary parenchymal diseases. In: Ettinger SE, Feldman EC, Côté E, eds. Ettinger’s Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 9th ed. Elsevier; 2024:3303-3372.
4. Sumner CM, Rozanski EA, Sharp CR, Shaw SP. The use of deep oral swabs as a surrogate for transoral tracheal wash to obtain bacterial cultures in dogs with pneumonia. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2011;21(5):515-520. doi:10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00670.x
5. Proulx A, Hume DZ, Drobatz KJ, Reineke EL. In vitro bacterial isolate susceptibility to empirically selected antimicrobials in 111 dogs with bacterial pneumonia. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2014;24(2):194-200. doi:10.1111/vec.12128
6. Radhakrishnan A, Drobatz KJ, Culp WTN, King LG. Community-acquired infectious pneumonia in puppies: 65 cases (1993-2002). JAVMA. 2007;230(10):1493-1497. doi:10.2460/javma.230.10.1493
7. Angus JC, Jang SS, Hirsh DC. Microbiological study of transtracheal aspirates from dogs with suspected lower respiratory tract disease: 264 cases (1989-1995). JAVMA. 1997;210(1):55-58.
8. Jameson PH, King LA, Lappin MR, Jones RL. Comparison of clinical signs, diagnostic findings, organisms isolated, and clinical outcome in dogs with bacterial pneumonia: 93 cases (1986-1991). JAVMA. 1995;206(2):206-209.
9. Lappin MR, Blondeau J, Boothe D, et al. Antimicrobial use guidelines for treatment of respiratory tract disease in dogs and cats: Antimicrobial Guidelines Working Group of the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases. J Vet Intern Med. 2017;31(2):279-294. doi:10.1111/jvim.14627
10. Rheinwald M, Hartmann K, Hähner M, Wolf G, Straubinger RK, Schulz B. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 502 dogs with respiratory signs. Vet Rec. 2015;176(14):357. doi:10.1136/vr.102694
11. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(7):e45-e67. doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST
12. Vientós-Plotts AI, Masseau I, Reinero CR. Comparison of short- versus long-course antimicrobial therapy of uncomplicated bacterial pneumonia in dogs: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(11):3096. doi:10.3390/ani11113096
13. Fernandes Rodrigues N, Giraud L, Bolen G, et al. Antimicrobial discontinuation in dogs with acute aspiration pneumonia based on clinical improvement and normalization of C-reactive protein concentration. J Vet Intern Med. 2022;36(3):1082-1088. doi:10.1111/jvim.16405
14. Adamantos S. Fluid therapy in pulmonary disease: how careful do we need to be? Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:624833. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.624833
15. Chaudhuri D, Nei AM, Rochwerg B, et al. 2024 focused update: guidelines on use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(5):e219-e233. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006172
16. Larsen T, Lee A, Brooks D, et al. Effect of early mobility as a physiotherapy treatment for pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother Can. 2019;71(1):82-89. doi:10.3138/ptc.2017-51.ep
17. Macdonald ES, Norris CR, Berghaus RB, Griffey SM. Clinicopathologic and radiographic features and etiologic agents in cats with histologically confirmed infectious pneumonia: 39 cases (1991-2000). JAVMA. 2003;223(8):1142-1150. doi:10.2460/javma.2003.223.1142
18. Dear JD, Vernau W, Johnson EG, Hulsebosch SE, Johnson LR. Clinicopathologic and radiographic features in 33 cats with aspiration and 26 cats with bronchopneumonia (2007-2017). J Vet Intern Med. 2021;35(1):480-489. doi:10.1111/jvim.16005
19. Schmal-Filius E, Nedorost N, Weissenbacher-Lang C, Weissenböck H. A retrospective study on the presence of selected infectious agents in lung samples of cats with pneumonia. Acta Vet Hung. 2020;68(3):275-284. doi:10.1556/004.2020.00037
20. Sasaki K, Shimoda M. Possible drug–drug interaction in dogs and cats resulted from alteration in drug metabolism: a mini review. J Adv Res. 2015;6(3):383-392. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2015.02.003
21. Kogan DA, Johnson LR, Sturges BK, Jandrey KE, Pollard RE. Etiology and clinical outcome in dogs with aspiration pneumonia: 88 cases (2004-2006). JAVMA. 2008;233(11):1748-1755. doi:10.2460/javma.233.11.1748
22. Tart KM, Babski DM, Lee JA. Potential risks, prognostic indicators, and diagnostic and treatment modalities affecting survival in dogs with presumptive aspiration pneumonia: 125 cases (2005-2008). J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2010;20(3):319-329. doi:10.1111/j.1476-4431.2010.00542.x
23. Levy N, Ballegeer E, Koenigshof A. Clinical and radiographic findings in cats with aspiration pneumonia: retrospective evaluation of 28 cases. J Small Anim Pract. 2019;60(6):356-360. doi:10.1111/jsap.12990
24. Caneschi A, Bardhi A, Barbarossa A, Zaghini A. The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: a narrative review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(3):487. doi:10.3390/antibiotics12030487