Michelle L. Oblak
DVM, DVSc, DACVS (SA), ACVS Fellow — Surgical Oncology
Dr. Oblak is an associate professor of soft tissue and oncologic surgery at Ontario Veterinary College (OVC) in Canada. She is the Animal Health Partners Research Chair in Veterinary Medical Innovation and the president of the Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology. Much of her translational research program focuses on lymph node mapping and using novel technology in these techniques. She regularly presents her work throughout the world and mentors veterinary students, interns, and residents. Dr. Oblak received her veterinary degree from OVC and then completed an ACVS surgical oncology fellowship at the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine.
Updated June 2024
Read Articles Written by Michelle L. OblakHui Yu Lu
BVSc
Dr. Lu is a graduate research student at OVC. She received her bachelor of veterinary science degree from Massey University, New Zealand. She has completed small animal rotating internships at Veterinary Specialists Aotearoa, New Zealand, and Atlantic Veterinary College, Canada, and surgical internships at Boundary Bay Veterinary Specialist Hospital, British Columbia, and Toronto Animal Health Partners Emergency and Specialty Hospital, Ontario, prior to her research position at OVC.
Read Articles Written by Hui Yu LuCharly McKenna
MSc, RLAT
Charly McKenna is the research manager of the Animal Health Partners Veterinary Innovation Platform and Clinical Trials at the OVC. She has experience at every level of research from working in laboratories, industry, veterinary clinics, and research animal facilities and has a strong background in preclinical research and animal models, research administration, and clinical data management. Charly has been involved with multiple safety studies for novel therapeutics and is interested in collaborations where companion animals can be utilized as a naturally occurring disease model in humans.
Read Articles Written by Charly McKennaRecent studies have demonstrated that removal of lymph nodes can affect long-term outcomes and survival, especially for patients with mast cell tumors. Since mass excision procedures for skin malignancies are frequently performed in primary care veterinary practice, it is important for clinicians to know how to identify the appropriate lymph node(s) to remove. Focusing on techniques that are easily accessible in primary care practice, including blue dyes and radiographic lymphography, this article discusses the indications for lymph node mapping and describes step-by-step techniques.
Take-Home Points
- Sentinel lymph node mapping is a straightforward procedure that can be performed in primary care practices that regularly remove skin tumors such as mast cell tumors.
- With limited additional equipment and cost, practitioners can identify the most appropriate lymph nodes to remove and thereby improve staging and possible treatment in these patients.
- Using a combination of pre- and intraoperative techniques for sentinel lymph node mapping helps ensure the correct lymph node is selected for removal.
- Use of imaging techniques and knowledge of local anatomy can improve confidence in practitioners who want to remove lymph nodes with limited previous training.
- Methylene blue and new methylene blue are chemically different dyes and cannot be used interchangeably. Avoid intravenous injection of methylene blue in cats.
In veterinary oncology, identification of metastatic disease allows for accurate patient staging and guides both treatment and prognostication. For many skin cancer types, such as squamous cell carcinoma, mast cell tumors, and melanoma, identification of metastatic lymph nodes is important in understanding the extent of disease to guide treatment recommendations (TABLE 1). In some cases, removing metastatic lymph nodes may also have survival benefit.3,4,7,8,10-12
Identifying Metastatic Lymph Nodes
The gold standard for assessing lymph nodes for metastasis is histopathology.13,14 In most cases, the entire lymph node is removed, or extirpated, to allow full assessment for evidence of disease.15 Studies in human medicine have shown the accuracy of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and palpation in detecting lymph node metastasis to vary depending on tumor type.16,17 Fine-needle aspiration and cytology of the lymph nodes is considered an inferior method of assessing for metastatic disease; reasons for inaccurate results include failure to reach the metastatic region of the lymph node during sampling and failure to sample the metastatic lymph node when sampling a single lymph node within a chain or cluster.18-20
Two main challenges exist when attempting to identify and remove the lymph nodes involved with draining malignant skin tumors. The first is that the first draining lymph node, or sentinel lymph node (SLN), is not always the lymph node(s) closest to the tumor (regional lymph node). The second is identifying and surgically removing the correct lymph node(s).
Identifying the Sentinel Lymph Node
The SLN can be identified using a technique called SLN mapping, or lymphography. Preoperatively, this technique uses injection of a contrast agent and subsequent radiographs or advanced imaging to identify uptake of the agent by lymph nodes; intraoperatively, dye is used to aid in visual identification of the SLN. Each has limitations; therefore, it is recommended that clinicians use a combination of preoperative and intraoperative lymphography to guide which lymph node(s) to remove.
The equipment and supplies needed for both preoperative and intraoperative SLN mapping are shown in FIGURE 1. The syringe size (1 to 5 mL) depends on the volume to be injected; use of a ruler and skin marker depends on clinician preference. For preoperative mapping, nonsterile gloves may be used in place of sterile gloves if desired.
Preoperative Indirect Radiographic Lymphography
A readily accessible preoperative technique for SLN mapping involves peritumoral injection of a radiopaque iodinated contrast agent followed by orthogonal (2-view) survey radiography of the area to visualize where the contrast drains from the injection sites to the lymph node.
Contrast Agent Choice and Volume
The choice of iodinated contrast agent depends on what is most accessible and financially feasible. Various water-soluble contrast agents are available, including iopamidol (IsoVue 200, 300, or 370) and iohexol (Omnipaque 180, 240, 300, or 350). The concentration listed on the bottle refers to the iodine concentration, with higher concentrations being more readily visible radiographically. Generally, these solutions are available in multidose bottles and have a shelf life of 1 to 3 years but need to be used within 6 to 24 hours of opening, so it is important to plan accordingly. The authors prefer to use iohexol rather than iopamidol for this technique due to accessibility and cost in their institution.
Ethiodized oil (Lipiodol) is an iodinated, poppyseed oil–based contrast agent that can be used in place of water-soluble contrast. Due to the lipid component, it is taken up into the lymphatic system more slowly than water-soluble agents. Using ethiodized oil may carry the benefit of more definitive contrast enhancement within the lymph node for a longer period of time; however, some local injection reactions have been described and this contrast can be cost prohibitive in some geographic regions.21-24
The volume of contrast agent administered depends on the distance between the primary tumor and the predicted SLN. For water-soluble contrast, a total volume of 3 to 4 mL (approximately 1 mL per injection site) is used in most circumstances; however, a larger volume (> 5 mL) can be considered if a greater distance (e.g., > 50 cm) of travel is anticipated. If more than 5 mL of water-soluble contrast is to be used, the contrast can be diluted 1:1 with sterile saline to help decrease the agent’s viscosity, decreasing transit time. However, this step will also dilute the iodine concentration, which can make radiographic visualization more challenging. In very small patients, or in locations that cannot accommodate a large volume of fluid intradermally, the injection volumes may be decreased to 0.25 to 0.5 mL per injection site (1 to 2 mL total); dilution of water-soluble contrast is not recommended in these cases. Ethiodized oil (0.8 to 1.6 mL total) should be used full strength.21-23
Patient Preparation
Sedation or general anesthesia is required to avoid the need for restraint as well as any movement that could limit lymphatic flow. It is important that, immediately following injection, there is no compression on any of the tissues within the lymphatic field (e.g., endotracheal tube ties around the jaw). The area around the primary tumor should be clipped and prepared with standard surgical preparation. The optimal patient positioning depends on the primary tumor’s location; however, wide-field survey radiographs of the whole region should be obtained to ensure visualization of lymphatic tracts.
Approach
- Obtain baseline orthogonal survey radiographs of the patient prior to injection to rule out any preexisting lymphatic or tissue mineralization (FIGUREÂ 2).
- Inject contrast intradermally using the peritumoral 4-quadrant technique described in BOX 1 (FIGURES 3 AND 4).
- If desired, massage the injection site for 30 seconds to encourage lymphatic flow to the SLN.
- Take orthogonal radiographs (ideally starting with the lateral view).
• With water-soluble agents, radiography should immediately follow massage, as these agents are rapidly cleared from the system. For diagnostic studies in dogs with mast cell tumors, a maximum time of 18 minutes was reported for visible contrast.25
• With ethiodized oil, radiographs are taken 24 hours following injection, and the contrast has been shown in healthy, purpose-bred dogs to still be visible at the level of the lymph node 1 to 2 months after injection. Lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes are consistently observed at 24 hours.24 - Assess for evidence of lymphatic tracking toward a lymph node or evidence of contrast within the lymph node compared with preoperative radiographs (FIGURE 5).
- If contrast is seen within the lymph node, no further imaging is required. If contrast is not seen within the lymph node on the first set of radiographs, repeat the radiographs at 5 minutes postinjection (for water-soluble agents).
• If no SLN is visible 5 minutes postinjection with water-soluble contrast, repeat steps 2 through 5.
• If no SLN is visible at 24 hours with ethiodized oil, repeat steps 2 through 5, repeating radiographs every 6 to 12 hours, if desired. - Following documentation of the location of the SLN (FIGURES 5 THROUGH 9), the margins of the site of interest can be clipped preemptively to accurately demarcate the surgical field.
- Regardless of the dye or contrast used, a peritumoral 4-quadrant injection is recommended to optimize success in visualizing the SLN. Intratumoral injections are not recommended, as altered lymphatics within the tumor could affect results.
- In all cases, the patient should be either sedated or placed under general anesthesia, and the region surrounding the tumor should be clipped and cleaned for aseptic surgical preparation.
- Identify the margins of the tumor (with a sterile marker if desired) and plan to make injections 2 to 5 mm from the tumor edge at 4 points around the tumor (FIGUREÂ 3).
- Draw the injection solution into a syringe and attach a small 23- to 25-gauge needle or butterfly catheter to the syringe. Facing the needle bevel upward, inject the solution into the intradermal space slowly over 10 to 30 seconds. If done correctly, a small bubble should form within the skin (FIGURE 4).
- When the injection is complete, place gauze over the needle site when withdrawing to minimize local spillage.
- Repeat the injection technique for a total of 4 times, resulting in 4 equally spaced injection sites. It may be necessary to change to a new needle for injections 3 and 4 depending on the patient.
- A vigorous 30-second massage of the injection sites with clean gloves or gauze can be performed to aid in local uptake of the solution when a large volume is used, but this is not often required. Take care to minimize or avoid manipulation of the tumor itself, especially with mast cell tumors.
Intraoperative Lymphography
The intraoperative use of blue dyes can be helpful to guide the surgeon with improved visualization of lymphatic tracts and lymph nodes. Methylene blue (MB) is the most described blue dye in the veterinary literature26-28 and is referenced here, although others (e.g., patent blue, isosulfan blue) can be used in a similar manner. It is important to note that MB and new methylene blue are chemically different dyes and cannot be used interchangeably.
Blue Dye
MB is generally safe when injected locally but can cause tissue staining; therefore, any important surgical boundaries should be defined prior to injection. Care should be taken to avoid intravascular injection of MB in cats. Because direct visualization of blue lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes is required, this technique should be combined with preoperative radiographic mapping so that the surgeon is informed of the targeted lymph node(s) and the location for surgical planning.
The volume of blue dye administered depends on the distance between the primary tumor and the predicted SLN. A small volume (1 mL total) can be used in most circumstances; however, a larger volume (3 mL) can be considered if a further distance of travel is anticipated. To decrease the degree of staining in the local surgical field, the lead author prefers to dilute MB 1:5 or 1:10 with sterile saline (i.e., 0.1 mL MB to 0.9 mL NaCl), but it can occasionally be more challenging to visualize blue coloration within the smaller lymphatic vessels. If desired, a total volume of up to 1 mL of MB can be used, diluted as appropriate for larger volumes. MB moves quickly through the lymphatic system and in most cases can be visible before completion of the injection. Retention times are not well documented; therefore, lymphadenectomy soon after MB injection is recommended.
Patient Preparation
The area(s) around the primary tumor and the lymph node to be removed should be prepared routinely for surgery. Lymphadenectomy should be performed prior to mass excision; therefore, positioning for this procedure while allowing access to the tumor for injection is prioritized. Often, it is possible to inject around the tumor with the patient positioned for lymphadenectomy with some creativity, but in some cases, repositioning the patient to first access the tumor and then prepare and drape for lymphadenectomy is required. Depending on the location of the primary tumor and SLN, 2 surgical fields may be required. If the patient requires repositioning after lymphadenectomy, the primary tumor site does not require draping at the time of MB injection but will need to be reprepped and draped prior to removal of the mass. The equipment and supplies needed for this procedure are shown in FIGUREÂ 1A.
Approach
- Demarcate the surgical margins of the primary tumor using a sterile surgical marker and ruler (FIGUREÂ 3).
- Inject MB intradermally using the peritumoral 4-quadrant technique described in BOX 1 (FIGUREÂ 4).
- If desired, massage the injection site for 30 seconds to encourage lymphatic flow to the SLN.
- Reposition the patient as necessary to perform the lymphadenectomy. Ideally the surgical site is draped in prior to peritumoral injection but if this is not possible, repositioning, prep, and draping should be performed as quickly as possible.
- With the guidance of preoperative imaging and anatomic landmarks, make an incision over the anticipated site of the SLN. Use the blue staining of MB to identify the SLN and perform lymphadenectomy as described elsewhere (FIGURES 10 AND 11).29
- Proceed with closure of the lymph node site(s) and excision of the primary tumor (FIGUREÂ 12).
Summary
SLN mapping is a straightforward procedure that can be performed in primary care practices that undertake curative-intent skin mass excisions. With limited additional equipment and cost, practitioners can identify the most appropriate lymph nodes to remove and improve staging and possible treatment in these patients.
References
1. Hargis AM, Thomassen RW, Phemister RD. Chronic dermatosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the beagle dog. Vet Pathol. 1977;14(3):218-228. doi:10.1177/030098587701400304
2. Marconato L, Murgia D, Finotello R, et al. Clinical features and outcome of 79 dogs with digital squamous cell carcinoma undergoing treatment: a SIONCOV observational study. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:645982. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.645982
3. Krick EL, Billings AP, Shofer FS, Watanabe S, Sorenmo KU. Cytological lymph node evaluation in dogs with mast cell tumors: association with grade and survival. Vet Comp Oncol. 2009;7(2):130-138. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5829.2009.00185.x
4. Hume CT, Kiupel M, Rigatti L, Shofer FS, Skorupski KA, Sorenmo KU. Outcomes of dogs with grade 3 mast cell tumors: 43 cases (1997-2007). JAAHA. 2011;47(1):37-44. doi:10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5557
5. Grimes JA, Matz BM, Christopherson PW, et al. Agreement between cytology and histopathology for regional lymph node metastasis in dogs with melanocytic neoplasms. Vet Pathol. 2017;54(4):579-587. doi:10.1177/0300985817698209
6. de Castro Cunha RM, Lavalle GE, Nunes FC, de Oliveira AR, de Lima Santos R, de Araújo RB. Canine squamous cell carcinoma: electrochemotherapy association with surgery and correlation with overall survival. Vet Comp Oncol. 2023;21(2):240-254. doi:10.1111/vco.12882
7. Chiti LE, Gariboldi EM, Stefanello D, De Zani D, Grieco V, Nolff MC. Sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy in cats with solid malignancies: an explorative study. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(22):3116. doi:10.3390/ani12223116
8. Arz R, Chiti LE, Krudewig C, et al. Lymph node metastasis in feline cutaneous low-grade mast cell tumours. J Feline Med Surg. 2023;25(1):1098612X221138468. doi:10.1177/1098612X221138468
9. van der Linde-Sipman JS, de Wit MM, van Garderen E, Molenbeek RF, van der Velde-Zimmermann D, de Weger RA. Cutaneous malignant melanomas in 57 cats: identification of (amelanotic) signet-ring and balloon cell types and verification of their origin by immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and in situ hybridization. Vet Pathol. 1997;34(1):31-38. doi:10.1177/030098589703400105
10. Chalfon C, Sabattini S, Finotello R, et al. Lymphadenectomy improves outcome in dogs with resected Kiupel high-grade cutaneous mast cell tumours and overtly metastatic regional lymph nodes. J Small Anim Pract. 2022;63(9):661-669. doi:10.1111/jsap.13525
11. Marconato L, Polton G, Stefanello D, et al. Therapeutic impact of regional lymphadenectomy in canine stage II cutaneous mast cell tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. 2018;16(4):580-589. doi:10.1111/vco.12425
12. Sabattini S, Kiupel M, Finotello R, et al. A retrospective study on prophylactic regional lymphadenectomy versus nodal observation only in the management of dogs with stage I, completely resected, low-grade cutaneous mast cell tumors. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17(1):331. doi:10.1186/s12917-021-03043-0
13. Gupta ML, Singh K. Correlation of fine needle aspiration cytology lymph node with histopathological diagnosis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(11):4719-4723. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163644
14. Tseng LJ, Matsuyama A, MacDonald-Dickinson V. Histology: the gold standard for diagnosis? Can Vet J. 2023;64(4):389-391.
15. Teymoortash A, Werner JA. Current advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;11:Doc04. doi:10.3205/cto000086
16. Mishra N, Rath KC, Upadhyay UN, Raut S, Baig SA, Birmiwal KG. Preoperative evaluation of cervical lymph nodes for metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study of efficacy of palpation, ultrasonography and computed tomography. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2016;7(2):186-190. doi:10.4103/0975-5950.201368
17. Qiao Y, Wang Y, Kang P, Li R, Liu Y, He W. The assessment of the accuracy of clinical preoperative lymph node. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(4):e13778. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013778
18. Bae S, Townsend KL, Milovancev M. Location of the targeted lymph node in a mandibular lymphocentrum: a needle aspiration model in canine cadavers. Vet Comp Oncol. 2021;19(4):671-677. doi:10.1111/vco.12750
19. Eryilmaz OT, Ucak R, Ozagari AA, Kabukcuoglu F. Diagnostic value of lymph node fine-needle aspiration cytology. Cytojournal. 2021;18:8. doi:10.25259/Cytojournal_1_2020
20. Fujii Y, Kanno Y, Koshita S, et al. Predictive factors for inaccurate diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Clin Endosc. 2019;52(2):152-158. doi:10.5946/ce.2018.125
21. Brissot HN, Edery EG. Use of indirect lymphography to identify sentinel lymph node in dogs: a pilot study in 30 tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017;15(3):740-753. doi:10.1111/vco.12214
22. Koehler PR, Meyers WA, Skelley JF, Schaffer B. Body distribution of ethiodol following lymphangiography. Radiology. 1964;82:866-871. doi:10.1148/82.5.866
23. De Bonis A, Collivignarelli F, Paolini A, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping with indirect lymphangiography for canine mast cell tumour. Vet Sci. 2022;9(9):484. doi:10.3390/vetsci9090484
24. Mayer MN, Silver TI, Lowe CK, Anthony JM. Radiographic lymphangiography in the dog using iodized oil. Vet Comp Oncol. 2012;11(2):151-161. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5829.2012.00334.x
25. Haas S, Linden D, Cole R, Smith A, Schleis S, Matz B. Indirect lymphography for sentinel lymph node detection in dogs with mast cell tumors. Can Vet J. 2023;64(2):142-148.
26. Beer P, Chiti LE, Nolff MC. The role of sentinel node mapping and lymphadenectomies in veterinary surgical oncology. Lymphatics. 2023;1(1):2-18. doi:10.3390/lymphatics1010002
27. Ram AS, Matuszewska K, Petrik J, Singh A, Oblak ML. Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods for assessing the degree of methylene blue staining in sentinel lymph nodes in dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:758295. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.758295
28. Lu HY, McKenna C, Ram A, Oblak ML. Effect of volume and methylene blue on fluorescence intensity and transit of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping in a simulated feline tumor model. Am J Vet Res. 2023;84(11):ajvr.23.07.0168. doi:10.2460/ajvr.23.07.0168
29. Wright T, Oblak ML. Lymphadenectomy: overview of surgical anatomy and removal of peripheral lymph nodes. Todays Vet Pract. 2016;6(4):20-28.