William Tancredi
DVM
Dr. Tancredi is a veterinarian, writer and reluctant futurist who believes the future of veterinary medicine should be shaped by the people who actually practice it. When he’s not elbows-deep in patient care at Old Ridge Veterinary Hospital in Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, he’s busy translating the world of emerging technology into something useful for clinicians who don’t have time for TED Talks. He serves on the AVMA’s Task Force for Emerging Technology and writes Doc’s FIRE, a Substack newsletter about AI, medicine, ethics and innovation.
Read Articles Written by William Tancredi
A three-doctor practice is spending $24,000 a year to make the phone ring. And then they’re losing $100,000 because nobody answered it.
You pay for SEO. You invest in Google Ads. You optimize your website, post on social media, even spring for direct mail. You’re spending thousands, sometimes tens of thousands, annually to get the phone to ring.
And then you miss the call.
It happens. Data from MissedCalls.help shows that 25–30% of calls to small and medium veterinary clinics go unanswered. Not because the staff doesn’t care. Not because they’re incompetent. Just because they’re busy.
And industry-spanning research confirms this pattern, with studies showing that 50% of leads never receive a second call attempt, despite evidence that 93% of converted leads are reached within six attempts. Which means half of businesses are just as bad as their would-be clients at following up.
Here’s the part that should make every practice owner’s stomach drop: 85% of those missed callers never call back.
This aligns with research from other industries showing that companies attempting to contact customers within an hour are nearly seven times more likely to qualify leads than those waiting even an hour longer, and more than 60 times more likely than companies waiting at least 24 hours.
You’re already trying to cheer yourself up by doing some math in your head, so let me help! Let’s say you’re a typical three-doctor practice. You get about 180 calls per month during business hours. Miss 25% of them? That’s 45 calls monthly, 540 annually. If 85% never return, you’ve permanently lost 459 potential appointments, and what percentage of those were new clients? There’s no good way to tell.
Let’s go further upstream. What did it cost you to generate those 459 calls in the first place? If you’re spending 0.5% to 1.0% on marketing, then three-doctor practice is probably spending $2,000/month. And those lost calls represent more than 20% of your total inbound volume.
So the real annual cost from the leaky funnel of marketing budget and missed opportunities? North of $100,000. Per year.
That’s not a rounding error. It’s a realistic and conservative estimate of ongoing loss that’s happening in every clinic.
Here’s what’s actually happening: Your clients aren’t leaving because they had a disappointing experience with your staff. They’re leaving because they had a disappointing experience with your voicemail. They didn’t hang up because someone was rude or unhelpful. They hung up because no one answered at all. The difference matters. Because you can’t fix a staffing problem by hiring better people when the real problem is that even the best people can only be in one place at a time.
And the math here is a wildly conservative estimate. It’s based on an average wellness exam ($75–$150) plus common diagnostics or treatments. Emergency visits and specialist referrals obviously skew higher, meaning actual lost revenue is likely significantly above this figure. If anything, we’re being gentle with how bad this is.
The Promise You Can’t Keep
Here’s what kills me about this: somewhere in that pile of 459 lost calls is a dog with a suspicious lump. A cat who stopped eating three days ago. A family that just moved to town and Googled “vet near me” because their puppy is limping.
They called you because they chose you. Your website convinced them. Your reviews earned their trust. Their neighbors told them that you’re the one to go see with a sick pet. They picked up the phone with every intention of becoming your client.
And you, through no fault of your own, because you were elbow-deep in a pyometra or explaining Addison’s disease to a terrified owner or trying to coax blood from a fractious cat without losing any of your own, didn’t answer.
Almost none of them will call back. They’ll call someone else. And that someone else just got a client you paid to acquire.
This isn’t about blame. It’s about physics. It’s about reality. There are only so many hands, so many hours, so much capacity for human attention before something gives.
Usually, it’s the people answering the phones. And it’s because they’re human.
When “Just Hire More Staff” Isn’t an Answer
- Front desk staff in veterinary medicine are performing occupational alchemy. They’re expected to:
- Answer phones (constantly!)
- Greet walk-ins with warmth and efficiency
- Manage the schedule like air traffic controllers
- Process payments while explaining charges to frustrated owners
- Navigate practice management software that sometimes feels like it was designed by people who’ve never actually worked a front desk
- Soothe anxious clients who are scared, grieving, or angry
- Do all of this with a smile, because god forbid they seem “unfriendly” while three doctors, ten technicians and six clients are asking for something.
Data suggests that non-veterinary support staff have among the highest turnover rates in the profession, with some practices reporting losing front desk employees within six months of hiring them. Research on customer service satisfaction across industries consistently shows that responsiveness ranks as the most critical factor in customer satisfaction evaluations, with 58% of customers ranking it as their top priority, followed closely by knowledge and expertise (44% ranking it in top two factors). When customers experience difficulties reaching service representatives—which 57% report having experienced—the impact on satisfaction is profound. The data is clear: accessibility drives satisfaction, and understaffing drives customer loss.
The cost of replacing a front desk employee easily runs into the thousands when you account for recruitment, training, lost productivity, and the toll on remaining staff morale. Multiply that by two or three turnovers per year, and you’re adding another five-figure expense to the pile.
But here’s the thing: the money isn’t the worst part.
The worst part is inevitably watching good people break down under impossible expectations. It’s the guilt of knowing your team is drowning and you can’t throw them a life raft because you don’t have one. It’s the receptionist who cries in the bathroom because a client yelled at her for
the third time today. It’s the lead CSR who’s been with you for eight years finally saying, “I can’t do this anymore.”
The challenge isn’t unique to veterinary medicine. Research across multiple industries found that 23% of companies never respond to web-generated leads at all, with an average response time of 42 hours among those that do respond.
Your CSR is on the phone with a grieving client when three more lines light up, a walk-in needs checkout, and a doctor is asking where the lab results are. She can’t clone herself. So something doesn’t get done. Usually, it’s the phone.
That’s the human cost. And it’s not acceptable.
The Upgrade Voicemail Should Have Been
Enter AI receptionists. Not as a replacement for your front desk staff, but as a support system that voicemail can never be.
Think of it this way: voicemail was supposed to solve the missed call problem. It didn’t, mostly because voicemail is a receptacle, not a response. It collects messages that someone (usually your already-overwhelmed CSR) has to return during the small windows between chaos (usually their “lunch” hour). By which point the client has often moved on because their experience was a disappointing one.
AI receptionists are what happens when you take voicemail, give it a functioning brain, and teach it to actually help the client.
These systems answer calls instantly, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They can:
- Respond to routine questions about services, pricing, and hours
- Book appointments directly into your practice management system
- Collect new client information (pet details, medical history, owner contact info)
- Provide directions, parking instructions, and pre-appointment guidance
- Communicate fluently in dozens of languages
And here’s the critical part: they can intelligently escalate calls to real people when needed.
- Custom routing rules mean that:
- Emergencies get forwarded to the on-call veterinarian immediately
- Billing questions go to your practice manager
- Surgical updates transfer to your post-op technician
- Routine scheduling and questions get handled by the AI
The result? Your front desk staff aren’t picking up the phone every 90 seconds. They’re available for the complex, nuanced, deeply human interactions that actually require a human.
This is the crucial part of how AI helps our practices and our people recover our humanity, and it’s the part that high-priced practice management consultants don’t dig deep enough to understand.
Your CSR didn’t go into veterinary medicine to recite your hours of operation for the fortieth time this week. They didn’t take this job to read parking instructions off a script or explain your cancellation policy to someone who’s already half-listening. Those tasks are necessary, but they’re not why they do the job.
They shows up for the client, the one whose voice breaks when talking about their old dog’s arthritis. For the new puppy owner who’s terrified they’re doing everything wrong and needs reassurance. For the person who just lost their cat and needs someone to say “I’m so sorry” with enough space and attention to mean it.
Easy to Miss, Hard to Forget
Those moments require presence. They require emotional bandwidth. They require the parts of us that can’t be automated: empathy, intuition, the ability to read what someone needs even when they can’t articulate it.
But you can’t give those moments what they deserve when you’re also trying to answer three phone lines, check someone out, and update the schedule. It’s difficult to be fully present for grief when you’re mentally tracking which callbacks you still need to make. It’s hard to offer genuine reassurance when you’re already anticipating the next interruption.
AI doesn’t make us more efficient at being human. It makes us more available for the work that requires us to be human.
It handles the transactional so we can focus on the relational. It manages the repetitive so we can attend to the irreplaceable. It takes care of the questions that have simple answers so we can sit with the questions that don’t.
This is the real value proposition. Not that AI does things faster or cheaper, though sometimes it does. Not that it captures more revenue, though often it will. The real value is that it gives us back the capacity to do the work that made us want to work in veterinary medicine in the first place.
The work that matters. The work that only we can do. The work that requires all of us to show up, not just the parts of us that aren’t already exhausted from answering the same questions all day.
That’s what we mean when we say AI helps us recover our humanity. It’s not about replacing human connection. It’s about protecting the space where human connection can actually happen.
Access Isn’t Luxury, It’s Responsibility
For clinics serving any community with significant multilingual or ESL populations, the ability to communicate in a client’s preferred language isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s a barrier to care.
Research in healthcare demonstrates that linguistic barriers have serious consequences for patient outcomes. Studies consistently show that people with limited English proficiency report greater barriers to accessing primary care, have poorer patient experiences, and are more likely to be in poor health. In human healthcare, physician-patient language discordance has been directly linked to lower quality of care and poor outcomes. While professional interpreting services have proven beneficial, they remain significantly underused relative to the need for them.⁵
Further, an editorial from the British Journal of General Practice cites the systemic challenge of language barriers, citing that 57% of respondents in recent research reported difficulties reaching customer service representatives through available channels, creating compounding barriers for those already facing linguistic barriers to care. It goes on to note that “interpreting services in primary care are underused in relation to the need for them.”
When AI receptionists can seamlessly switch between languages, something profound happens: access to veterinary care stops being limited by language barriers.
This isn’t about demographics or market capture. It’s about the fundamental promise of veterinary medicine: that pets deserve care, and clients deserve respect. If a family’s preferred language is Mandarin or Tagalog or Polish, they shouldn’t have to struggle through a phone conversation in their second language while their dog is vomiting blood or their cat is collapsing. We don’t let our patients’ failure to speak our language stop us from delivering care, why would we let their owners’?
Multilingual AI makes that struggle a thing of the past for hospitals that adopt it. And in doing so, it serves the mission of the best practices: better patient care through better client access.
The Cohesive Case: Revenue, Relief, and Responsibility
So what is this really about?
It’s about all of it. And that’s the point.
It’s about revenue: Capturing the 459 annual clients you’re currently losing and the $100,000 in combined losses from missed opportunities and wasted marketing spend.
It’s about relief: giving your front desk staff the support they desperately need so they stop quitting, stop crying, and start being able to do the parts of their job that make them want to show up in the first place.
It’s about responsibility: ensuring that when a scared pet owner calls for help, they’re heard; regardless of when they call, what language they speak, or whether your lobby happens to be unusually chaotic at that exact moment.
These aren’t competing priorities. They’re the same priority viewed from different angles.
A practice that captures more clients has more revenue. More revenue means better pay, better benefits, more staffing flexibility. That means less burnout. Less burnout means better client service. Better client service means better patient care. Better patient care is the entire reason any of us got into this profession.
Technology isn’t magic. It doesn’t promise to solve every problem or eliminate every challenge with a wave of a wand. What it does (when implemented thoughtfully and with intention) is change the client experience and allow for a more efficient allocation of resources. It takes the transactional, repetitive, soul-crushing parts of front desk work and automates them, freeing up human attention for the irreplaceably human moments of compassion and empathy.
The Future of the Front Desk
The convergence of evidence from veterinary medicine and a variety of other fields is striking. Whether examining online sales leads, customer contact strategies of timing and persistence, or healthcare access where language barriers obstruct medical care, the pattern is consistent: accessibility and responsiveness are fundamental to service delivery and success.
Let’s be clear: we will always need real, in-person, human CSRs. Always.
This technology isn’t replacing your receptionist any more than adding voicemail did, but it is enhancing the client experience in ways that deepen trust, retain clients, and enhance access to care.
The front desk is the first place where trust and reputation is built, where anxious pets are soothed, where human intuition catches the things no algorithm ever could. (“She said the dog is fine, but her voice sounds wrong. I’m flagging this one for doc.”)
AI receptionists aren’t a replacement. They’re a massive upgrade to voicemail that saves CSRs time and sanity, preserves client engagement and attachment, supports the veterinary mission of better patient care, and reduces financial loss. You’re not using an AI receptionist to replace a CSR, you’re doing it to give clients a better experience than voicemail.
The industry is already moving in this direction. Data from MissedCalls.help suggests that early adopters report:
- Up to 90% reduction in missed calls
- Measurable decrease in front desk turnover
- Significant improvements in client satisfaction and retention
The question isn’t whether this technology works. The question is whether practices can afford – financially, operationally, ethically – to keep operating without it. In an industry where customer satisfaction directly influences loyalty and retention—with satisfied customers more likely to make repeat visits and recommend services to others. The cost of complacent inaction compounds exponentially over time.
The phone is ringing right now. Someone’s dog is sick. Someone’s cat is scared. Someone – a client, a neighbor, a friend – chose you.
Are you going to answer the call?
The Numbers That Should Keep You Up at Night
- 1 in 4 veterinary calls goes unanswered
- 85% of those pet owners never call back
- 459 clients lost annually (typical 3-doctor practice)
- $100,000+ in combined lost revenue and wasted marketing spend per year
- $3,000–$7,000 cost to replace a single burned-out CSR
What Pet Owners Are Saying
Selected feedback from online reviews across multiple practices:⁷
“Called three times over two days, never got a callback. Took my dog elsewhere.”
“[T]he vets are great but good luck ever getting someone to answer the phone.”
“I’ve been on hold for 20+ minutes multiple times. They clearly need more staff.”
“Finally gave up trying to schedule an appointment and went to [competitor]. Their loss.”
Implementation Checklist
- Week 1: Investigate the Baseline ○
- Determine total calls, total missed calls, time-to-answer, booked appointments/day, CSR workload sentiment
- Week 2: Deploy AI Receptionist with Limited Scope
- Start with after hours call fielding, ensure that the option to use is opt-in to determine client preference (i.e. “Press one to speak to our AI receptionist, press two to leave a voicemail.”)
- Weeks 3-4: Evaluate impact; enable during live hours with escalations for emergencies
- Weeks 5-6: Enable multilingual flow for most common second languages in your community
- Weeks 7-8: Implementation review; changes to missed-call rate, CSR sentiment, determine scale/iterate/discontinue
Commercial Disclosure: This article is presented in partnership with MissedCalls.help. Analysis and opinions are the author’s own.
AI Disclosure: Generative AI was used selectively as an evaluator, editor, and summarizer of content.
References
1. American Animal Hospital Association. (n.d.). Form the path to increasing retention in veterinary medicine [White paper]. AAHA. Retrieved October 23, 2025, from https://www.aaha.org/practice-resources/research-center/white-paper-form-the-path-to-increasing-retention-in-veterinary-medicine/
2. Cano-Ibáñez, N., Zolfaghari, Y., Amezcua-Prieto, C., & Khan, K. S. (2021). Physician–patient language discordance and poor health outcomes: A systematic scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 629041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.629041
3. Kontopantelis, E., Roland, M., & Reeves, D. (2010). Patient experience of access to primary care: Identification of predictors in a national patient survey. BMC Family Practice, 11, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-61
4. Malanik, F. (2024). Customer service analysis: Live chat vs. on-call in Finland [Bachelor’s thesis, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences].
5. Marvicsin, D., Danko, K., & Schroeder, L. (2015). After-hours calls at two academic primary-care nurse-managed health centers. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11(2), 233-239. DOI:10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.07.042
6. Oldroyd, J. B., McElheran, K., & Elkington, D. (2011, March). The short life of online sales leads. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 28-29.
7. Parra-Gallego, L. F., Purohit, T., Vlasenko, B., Orozco-Arroyave, J. R., & Magimai-Doss, M. (2024). Cross-transfer knowledge between speech and text encoders to evaluate customer satisfaction. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2024 (pp. 177-181).
https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2024-514
8. *Velocify. (2012). The ultimate contact strategy: How to best use phone and email for contact and conversion success [White paper]. Velocify Sales Optimization Study.
9. Whitaker, K. L., Krystallidou, D., Williams, E. D., Black, G., Vindrola-Padros, C., Braun, S., & Gill, P. (2022). Addressing language as a barrier to healthcare access and quality [Editorial]. British Journal of General Practice, 72(714), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718013
10. Reviews have been anonymized and are offered without citation to protect practice privacy. Individual hospitals are not identified to maintain professional standards and avoid unfairly highlighting specific businesses experiencing common industry-wide challenges. These representative examples reflect patterns documented across hundreds of veterinary practice reviews and are used solely to illustrate systemic issues affecting the profession as a whole.
