Kellie G. Olah
SPHR, CVPM, SHRM-SCP
HR Huddle columnist Kellie Olah is the practice management and human resources consultant at Veterinary Business Advisors. The company provides legal, human resources and practice management services to veterinarians nationwide. Olah is a certified veterinary practice manager, a certified veterinary business leader and a nationally certified senior professional in human resources.
Read Articles Written by Kellie G. Olah
Q: I need guidance on a situation I want to handle thoughtfully and accurately. A client service representative with us for over three years now wants to use an alias, rather than her first name, when answering the phone. Her request appears to be more about privacy than related to a safety concern, gender identity or a legal issue. We use first names and initials in internal documentation and on name badges, so I don’t know if she plans to request broader changes. What should I do from a policy and employee relations standpoint?
A: First, I recommend having a brief and respectful follow-up conversation with the employee to explore whether an underlying reason is behind her request. Sometimes, employees won’t immediately disclose sensitive circumstances, such as harassment, domestic violence or online safety, especially if they aren’t sure whether management will support them. Since your CSR’s request came suddenly, gently explore it nonconfrontationally. Try asking, “Would you be open to sharing a bit more about what’s prompting this preference? It would help me make sure we handle it appropriately and supportively.”
If you learn that her request is simply a matter of personal privacy (with no safety or legal basis), I recommend honoring it with a few essential guardrails.
There’s generally no legal issue in allowing an employee to use another first name in a public-facing context, like answering phones, especially when the alias is consistent, isn’t intended to deceive, and doesn’t confuse clients or team members. Many workplaces are sensitive to identity and privacy preferences, so making allowances can demonstrate your flexibility and respect for individual boundaries, provided the alias doesn’t interfere with operations or accountability.
That said, set clear boundaries. The alias should be limited to verbal phone introductions or potentially other informal client interactions, like greeting walk-in clients. The name must not change from day to day and should not duplicate another staff member’s.
I would draw a firm line by using the employee’s legal name in internal documentation, medical records, and any systems that function as part of your legal, clinical or employment record. In addition, client records, timekeeping systems, patient notes, invoices and HR documentation should not be altered to reflect an alias. Those documents could be subject to audit, subpoena or other scrutiny at some point, so they must reflect accurate and legal identifiers.
Once you and the employee are in agreement, document the situation and resolution in an email or memo. It should include the name that must be used in phone greetings, clarify when the alias is permitted and note that all internal records will continue to reflect the CSR’s legal name.
Q: A veterinary technician working at our hospital for just over a year received a formal strike related to her inability to remain composed and effective under pressure. At the end of the conversation, she disclosed that she was pregnant. Since then, she has had multiple unscheduled absences, typically because she said she wasn’t feeling well. Some of the callouts were accompanied by a doctor’s note when we requested one, but the majority were not formally documented. While we desire to be respectful and supportive, the frequency of her absences is beginning to impact the team. According to our employee handbook, unplanned absences are tracked over a rolling 12-month period. The progressive disciplinary steps are a possible verbal warning for one to three unplanned absences, a written warning for four to eight of them, and potential termination upon the ninth occurrence. Chronic or excessive absenteeism, even outside those thresholds, may warrant disciplinary action. The technician has not requested a specific accommodation nor indicated that her absences were directly related to a medical issue or pregnancy complication. How can we ensure compliance with pregnancy protections while maintaining consistency with our attendance policy?
A: While your handbook outlines a clear policy on unplanned absences and progressive discipline, it is secondary when an employee’s medical condition, such as pregnancy-related complications, might qualify for protection under federal law.
Before you take further action, determine whether your technician’s absences are pregnancy-related. If they are, and if the condition affects her ability to work, the Americans with Disabilities Act might require you to consider a reasonable accommodation, which could include intermittent leave, flexible scheduling or temporary duty adjustments. In such cases, don’t apply your attendance policy strictly. Also, determine how best to support her while maintaining your business’s needs.
To achieve clarity, speak with her to understand the reasons for her recent absences and whether she anticipates needing accommodations. Such a compliant and compassionate response keeps your expectations clear.
Here’s what you can say during the conversation:
“Hi, [Name]. Thanks for taking a few minutes to meet today. I wanted to check in with you regarding your recent attendance. We’ve noticed a pattern of absences over the past couple of months and wanted to review them with you. We documented a few of those callouts, and I appreciate that you provided a doctor’s note for the most recent ones. (Some states don’t permit asking for a doctor’s note unless specific criteria are met.) In the meantime, I want to ask if there’s anything we should be aware of medically or otherwise that might be contributing to your time away. Is there any context you’d like to share?”
If your technician says her absences were pregnancy-related, you can respond: “Thank you for sharing that. We want to make sure we’re supporting you appropriately. If you anticipate needing further time off or modifications to your schedule or duties, we’re happy to talk through what’s reasonable. In some cases, we may ask for documentation from your medical provider to help guide those decisions. The goal here is to make sure you feel supported while we continue to manage team coverage and practice operations.”
At that point, you can provide her with a reasonable-accommodation request form.
If the absences were not pregnancy-related, you might say: “Thank you for clarifying. I just wanted to make sure we asked the question before moving forward. As a reminder, our attendance policy outlines that multiple unplanned absences over a rolling 12-month period may result in progressive discipline. Based on the current pattern, you’re approaching the point where a written warning would typically be issued. If future absences continue, we might need to initiate the next step in the policy.”
After the meeting, be sure to document the conversation neutrally and factually. If the absences were tied to a pregnancy and your employee asked for an accommodation or seems to need one, the documentation becomes part of your legal compliance.
Continue to monitor your technician’s attendance and consider setting up weekly or biweekly check-ins to maintain an open line of communication. This action signals your support, allows her to raise concerns, and helps you manage the situation with consistency.
LEGALLY SPEAKING
According to U.S. News & World Report, “Changing your name for reasons other than marriage, divorce or adoption will typically involve a more complicated legal process. A common process is to file paperwork with a family court or probate court, including an explanation of the reason for the requested change. This generally requires filling out a name change form, filing the form with the court, paying a fee (usually less than $500) and providing associated documentation with the court.”
